School of Creative Arts
Human Research Ethics
HumanEthics_23Mar2005.pdf
DEPARTMENTAL HUMAN ETHICS ADVISORY GROUP (DHEAG)
Introduction:
All research involving human subjects by students and staff in the School of Creative Arts
should conform to the University of Melbourne
protocols that support ethical research. In some cases, before any such research is
undertaken proposals should be submitted to the DHEAG
for consideration, feedback and, if appropriate, approval.
Research involving humans that may require ethics approval include:
- gathering information about human beings (and organisations) through interviewing,
surveying, questionnaires, observation of human behaviour, audio/video taping;
- using archived data in which individuals are identifiable;
- studying or researching in illegal activities.
Ethics approval may also be required where, as part of assessment requirements in a particular subject,
students are asked to undertake research involving human subjects.
What do I do first?
First, discuss your project with your supervisor(s). Your supervisor is there to advise you, to help you develop your
project and give due consideration to the ethical issues involved. The supervisor also oversees the project, once it is
underway.
You can also seek assistance from members of the SCA Department Human Ethics Advisory Group (DHEAG). Your DHEAG
provides advice to researchers and to the Human Ethics Sub-Committee (HESC) about the academic validity of research
projects, their ethical implications as well as compliance with guidelines and legislation. DHEAG members and meeting dates are set out below
How do I submit an application?
Application forms can be downloaded from MRIO's human ethics website:
www.research.unimelb.edu.au/humanethics/
Discuss with your supervisor which form you will need to use. Complete the form and include any relevant attachments
and also make sure you have the necessary signatures (i.e., student researcher/s, supervisor/s). Submit your
application to your DHEAG.
Hand-written applications will not be accepted.
Low risk projects - DHEAG approval
A research project that is deemed to be of low risk to participants and researchers may be able to be approved by the
DHEAG. This process is called Expedited Review. There is a checklist to help determine if your project is of low risk.
Both the checklist and the Expedited Review application form can be downloaded from the website: (Form 2 and 2a)
http://www.research.unimelb.edu.au/humanethics/processes/applicform/
Submit the completed checklist and application form to your DHEAG for review. You may be asked to make some
changes to your project before it is given final approval. You will receive notification from the DHEAG that your project
has been approved. You may then commence your research. A copy of your project application will be forwarded to
MRIO to be registered and given a HREC number.
Medium or high risk projects - HREC approval
In cases where your project involves moderate or high risk, or where the funding body, research site or host organisation
requires it, you will need to obtain ethics approval from one of the University's Human Ethics Sub-Committees. In this
case you will need to fill out a different application form (Form 1) and then submit it to the DHEAG. The DHEAG will
consider the project, perhaps request some changes, then make a recommendation to the relevant HESC to formally
review and approve your application. At this point you will then forward the endorsed application, with the required
number of copies, to MRIO for Sub-Committee review. The project will be registered and given a HREC number.
Following its review, the HESC may ask you to clarify certain aspects of your project or to make some changes before it
is given final approval. You will receive written notification from the HESC advising that the project has been approved.
You may then commence your research.
The three Sub-Committees normally meet monthly during semester - see meeting schedule. You should allow
four to six weeks for HESC approval after your application has been reviewed and endorsed by your supervisor(s),
DHEAG and Head of Department.
All applications for ethics approval must include a copy of any written information describing the project which
is to be given to potential participants. Intending applicants are strongly advised to consult the
Informed Consent
guidelines and closely follow the Plain Language Statement examples.
PLEASE NOTE: The original and six copies of the ethics application must be submitted to:
Coralie Crocker (Postgraduate Programs Officer)
School of Creative Arts,
Room A203, Level 2,
Arts Centre Building
University of Melbourne
Phone:+61 3 8344 8362
ccrocker@unimelb.edu.au
RESEARCH MUST NOT COMMENCE UNTIL ETHICS CLEARANCE HAS BEEN OBTAINED.
|
DHEAG Committee:
- Assoc Prof Ken Wach (Chair, Head of School)
- Assoc Prof Kevin Brophy (Deputy Head of School)
- Assoc Prof Angela O'Brian (Postgraduate Coordinator)
- Dr Denise Varney (Theatre Studies Coordinator)
- Dr Peter Eckersall (Theatre Studies Lecturer)
- Ms Alyson Campbell (Postgraduate Student Representative)
- Ms Coralie Crocker (Postgraduate Programs Officer)
Meeting Schedule for 2006
|
Meeting Date |
Application Deadline (tentative) |
|
30th January | TBA |
|
13th February | 3rd February |
|
31st May | 15th May |
|
19th July | 3rd July |
Useful Web Sites
Variation to Project.
If subsequent variations or modifications to the project are required once approval has been granted,
a justification for these amendments must be submitted to DHEAG for approval. If DHEAG considers that the
proposed changes are significant, researchers may be required to submit a new application for approval of the revised project.
Annual Reports.
The Human Research Ethics Committee requires all researchers to submit an annual report on each of their projects at the
end of each year, or at the conclusion of the project if it continues for less than a year. Requests for annual
reports are sent out by the Human Research Ethics Office in November/December each year. Failure to submit a progress
report at the end of each year will mean approval for the project will lapse and a new application will need to be submitted.
Research Data and Records
The retention of complete, accurate and retrievable results is integral to the research process.
Good research practice entails the retention of research data and records for periods of at least
five years after the publication of results (or longer depending on regulatory or sponsor
requirements and archival/historical value). This allows for the discussion of data and research
methods with colleagues and for verification of the research such as might be required to refute allegations or
falsification of data. The Responsibilities of Researchers are set out in the Policy on the Management of Research
Data and Records www.unimelb.edu.au/records/research.html
|